Welcome to Controls Overload

Question

1

I have an orientation problem that requires something better than a prox. switch, but not use a camera sensor. Does anyone have a recommendation for something in between?

Originally posted on LinkedIn Group Automation and Control Engineering discussion forum.

edited Dec 22 at 17:14

asked Dec 21 at 15:06

Jeremy Sluyters♦♦
387●1●10

	Can you give us some more info about the application? A small laser distance meter might work. – Scott Whitlock♦ Dec 21 at 15:26
	Definitely more clarification if you can - don't rule a vision sensor out though, they can be remarkably inexpensive if you are basically looking for a 'smart photoeye'. – Kevin A Dec 21 at 23:13

Michael Loch · Answer 1 · 2009-12-22 14:18:07Z UTC

Yes please a bit more clarification of the app. There are a host of different sensors available that can solve this. Don't rule out a prox just yet if this is just part detection. There are some that have built in ASIC chips to make them more accurate and allow a cutoff not unlike a photo.

Jeremy Sluyters · Answer 2 · 2009-12-22 17:17:56Z UTC

0

Laser sensing might be an option. IFM has some low cost ones as well that I have used successfully in many applications. ( http://www.ifm.com/ifmca/web/dsfs!O1D100.html )

answered Dec 22 at 17:17

Jeremy Sluyters♦♦
387●1●10

Jason K · Answer 3 · 2010-01-11 19:35:28Z UTC

Hi Jeremy - I successfully used that exact IFM sensor for orientating a oddly shaped aluminum tube into a well. I would also suggest looking at what Keyence has to offer, although it will be more costly.

I've always been a fan of Balluff products too - they have a huge array of prox's... Also, I've found their service to be very good...

Finally, I had a lot of success with sensors from a company call "Tri-Tronics". Their "EZ" series of photoeye worked quite well in many "odd" applications. In your area, they would be distributed by IAC Associates. Try calling: Sean Doyle 226-220-7908 Or Murray Barber 519-966-3444.

Orientation Sensing Options

3 Answers